|
:::''For other uses of "psychosocial", see Psychosocial (disambiguation)'' In ufology, the psychosocial hypothesis, abbreviated PSH, argues that at least some UFO reports are best explained by psychological or social means. It is often contrasted with the better known extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH), and is particularly popular among UFO researchers in the United Kingdom, such as David Clarke, Hilary Evans, the editors of ''Magonia'' magazine, and many of the contributors to ''Fortean Times'' magazine. It is also popular in France since the publication in 1977 of a book written by Michel Monnerie,〔Monnerie, M. (1977). ''Et si les ovnis n’existaient pas ?'' Paris : Les Humanoïdes Associés.〕 ''Et si les ovnis n'existaient pas?'' (''What if ufos do not exist?''). UFOlogists claim that the psychosocial hypothesis is occasionally confused with aggressive anti-ETH debunking, but that there is an important difference in that the PSH researcher sees UFOs as an ''interesting'' subject that is worthy of serious study, even if it is approached in a skeptical (i.e. non-credulous) way.〔''"Ritual Debunker Abuse"'', the Hierophant, ''Fortean Times'' issue 216 (November 2006), page 13.〕 The psychosocial hypothesis builds on the finding that most ufo reports have mundane explanations like celestial objects, airplane lights, balloons, and a host of other misperceived things seen in the sky which suggests the presence of an unusual emotional climate which distorts perceptions and the perceived significance and anomalousness of merely terrestrial stimuli.〔Allan Hendry, The UFO Handbook, Doubleday, 1979, p. 154〕〔“Allan Hendry Comments on Dr. Westrum’s Review” (of The UFO Handbook) Zetetic Scholar #5, 1979, pp. 107-10.〕〔Elaine Hendry “Comments on J. Richard Greenwell’s ‘Theories, Hypotheses, and Speculations on the Origins of UFOs’” Zetetic Scholar, #7, 1980, pp. 79-80.〕 In the more exotic situation where people claim direct contact with extraterrestrials, the need for a psychosocial approach seems obliged by the presence of at least 70 claims of people meeting Venusians and at least 50 claims of meeting Martians; both worlds now known to be uninhabitable and devoid of any advanced civilization. Hoaxing seems to explain some of these contactees claims, but visionary dreams, hallucinations, and other mental processes are clearly implicated in such myth-based material. By generalization, the other material suggesting the presence of extraterrestrial entities from elsewhere is hypothesized to be explainable by similar means. The observed presence of surreal dream-like activity and imagery or themes based in the cultural environment and historically understood sources reinforces the proposition that the extraterrestrial hypothesis is unnecessary and, by Occam's razor, probably incorrect. ==Origin== In the English ufo literature, the term psycho-social hypothesis first achieved prominence in April 1984 when the cover of ''Magonia'' featured “The Rise of the Psycho-social hypothesis” by Jacques Scornaux and Peter Rogerson. Scornaux’s〔(【引用サイトリンク】title=The Rising and the Limits of a Doubt. Jacques Scornaux )〕 use of the term traces back to French ufo controversies spawned by Michel Monnerie whose book ''Le Naufrage des Extra-terrestres'' (1979) presented “le modèle socio-psychologique” as a direct challenge to the extraterrestrial hypothesis.〔Michel Monnerie, ''Le Naufrage des Extra-terrestres'', Nouvelles Editions Rationalistes, 1979, p. 56.〕 Claude Maugé had exposed ''Magonia'' readers to a brief outline of “the socio-psychological model” emerging from French studies in 1983, but flipping the syllables made the term more conventional to existing academic vocabulary.〔Claude Mauge “Questioning the ‘Real’ Phenomenon” ''Magonia'' #13 1983, pp. 3-5, 15. http://magonia.haaan.com/2010/questioning-the-real-phenomenon-claude-mauge/〕 Rogerson’s adopting the term represented to him an evolution and de-escalation of exotic hypotheses he had been entertaining that originally included paranormal notions like psi, collective hallucinations, and the collective unconscious.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title=It’s All In The Mind. Peter Rogerson )〕 The term marked the embrace of a fully normal system of psychological processes that included dreams, hallucinations, fantasy interpretations of materially real stimuli, distortions of perception, and metachoric experiences. These were things influenced by cultural myths, social conditioning, and historical context. Since 1968, the circle of writers who wrote for ''Magonia'' had been exploring alternatives to the ETH under a general sense that it had failed to account for much of what was being seen in the high strangeness cases. Roger Sandell spoke of being a nuts and bolts ufologist till he realized that ufo reports he had gathered from a 1905 Welsh wave made little sense and were part of a larger complex of ghost stories and religious visions. He notes that ufological thought had once been dominated by theories that Venus and Mars were the source of ufos, but the space program had shown they were in fact quite lifeless. Add in the apocalyptic and demonological material of then contemporary ufo thinking and the need for a major re-think seemed obliged. Could it all be mundane products of the human mind such as dreams, rumors and hoaxes?〔Roger Sandell, Peter Rogerson, John Rimmer “Ten Years On: The Editors Look Back on a Decade of Ufology” ''MUFOB, new series 10'' spring 1978, pp. 7-8, 16. http://magonia.haaan.com/2009/decade/〕 Peter Rogerson had similarly become convinced we are seeing the rise of a contemporary mythology and advocated for a comprehensive search for historical antecedents of ufo rumors. He began the search for the social factors driving ufo flaps and social panics. Magonia writers would point to “a relationship between ufo waves and times of radical social change”〔“Notes & Quotes” ''Magonia #3'' Spring 1980, pp. 10-11.〕 with Rogerson offering that the 1954 French flap had occurred at “a time of national defeat and government crisis.”〔Peter Rogerson, "Towards a revisionist history of Ufology" ''MUFOB new series #13'' Winter 1978/9, pp. 13-15.〕 In one striking piece, he offered a lengthy meditation on the social resonances and ideological influences shaping the varying beliefs found among ufo writers over the course of ufo history.〔Peter Rogerson “Why Have All the UFOs Gone?” ''Magonia #7'' 1981 pp. 3-9, 13-15. http://magonia.haaan.com/1981/why-have-all-the-ufos-gone-part-1/〕 Allen Greenfield confessed in ''Magonia'' in 1979 he had become disenchanted with the divisive emotionality and groupthink of ufo culture and worried about the influence of belief he eventually saw in his early work advocating the ETH. He was starting to think the bigger mystery was not what ufos were, but “What are we to make of the whole world-wide rumor complex…what are we to make of the rumor – the ufo mythos?” What was the meaning of all the mythologizing that attends the spread of the ufo rumor?〔Allen H. Greenfield “Confessions of a Ufologist” ''MUFOB, new series 15'' summer 1979, pp. 7-8, 13. http://magonia.haaan.com/category/author/greenfield-allen/〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Psychosocial hypothesis」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|